If you’re looking for a car that gets decent mileage on the road but also functions as an aircraft when you’re in the mood to fly, you may have some options in the near future. The Terrafugia Transition Street-Legal Airplane is now one step closer to delivery after a successful prototype test flight, according to its Massachusetts-based manufacturer.

Terrafugia says it has taken about 100 pre-orders for the $279,000 vehicle, which gets 35 mpg on the road and can be fueled with unleaded automotive gasoline. That mileage is better than many of the top-rated vehicles at FuelEconomy.gov, though to be fair, the U.S. government does not yet have a Flying Car classification for fuel efficiency (the Transition is officially classified by the Federal Aviation Administration as a Light Sport Aircraft).

You can see what it’s like to drive and fly the Transition in the video below. It will also be on display at the New York International Auto Show April 6-15 in New York City.

If you’d like to shop around, the Transition isn’t the only flying car being readied for the market. As the Los Angeles Times notes, Netherlands-based PAL-V also recently concluded successful test flights of its vehicle, which flies using a folding rotor and propeller (see photos in the gallery above). The PAL-V (which stands for Personal Air and Land Vehicle) compares poorly to the Transition on road mileage — 28 mpg, according to the website — but the company does say “there will also be versions that use biodiesel or bio-ethanol.”

Terrafugia says the Transition has a flying range of 400 miles, while the PAL-V has a range of 220-315 miles. (In case you’re dreaming of lifting off right out of a traffic jam, note that both vehicles require a runway to take flight.)

Watch PAL-V’s demo video:

Which flying car looks like a winner to you?

(Related Photos: “New Flying-Car Design Revealed“)

Comments

  1. Jay Soni
    Mumbai
    April 5, 2012, 11:48 pm

    PAL-V definitely :)

  2. Monika Ballew
    California
    April 6, 2012, 11:50 am

    I wonder what kind of driving/piloting skills will be required

  3. Michael
    United Kingdom
    April 7, 2012, 7:44 am

    Transition :)

  4. anon
    April 7, 2012, 5:26 pm

    There’s good and bad for these “flying cars”. First, let’s look at the good. You don’t need to worry about a taxi or something when you fly your own airplane — oh sorry, “flying car” so you just land and do your thing. The downfall? Well, I’m sure it uses the same fuel that airplanes do, so where exactly do you fill up your tank besides the airport? Secondly, you need a runway or a very straight path and flying off from an empty interstate would be illegal.

    I’m waiting until anti-grav flying cars combined with google’s self-driving technology. Until then, real flying cars don’t actually exist even if they are technically considered “flying cars”. Speaking of which, a lot of “experimental” aircrafts uses engines from cars like from a Volkswagen beetle or something. Technically these flying cars have existed for a long while ;)

  5. myturn
    April 10, 2012, 10:47 am

    Anon, the video about the Transition shows it being filled at a regular gas station. I’m not sure if it’s diesel or gas, but it certainly wouldn’t be special airplane fuel. Also, the experimental aircrafts you mention with car engines in them are probably not street legal vehicles or are only for flight, so they wouldn’t be flying cars. I get that you’re using humour there, but I’m not sure if the smily face means ‘so there’ funny or ‘just joking around’ funny.

    I am wondering about the blind spot on the Transition. Would the folded wing be in the way of checking it or is it far enough back to see well enough. I’m thinking that since it’s allowed to be on the streets, a regular shoulder check will do the trick. It would be great to sit in one to try it out.

    Both vehicles look like fun to me, but I’m a nervous flier, so there’s no point in buying one and never flying it.

  6. Phil
    Canada
    April 11, 2012, 1:38 am

    I love the dream. But how is this better than owning a Toyota Tercel and sharing 1/4 of a regular Cessna? The Tercel is a better car, the Cessna is a better airplane, and the combination is probably cheaper.

  7. kevin
    el salvador
    April 11, 2012, 5:28 pm

    this is getting crazy, i would like to see a flying car lol

  8. dee dee
    hampstead,nc
    April 11, 2012, 8:24 pm

    My new mail car. brings a new meaning to AIR-MAIL

  9. Teri Knauer-Schafer
    Reeds Spring Missouri
    April 12, 2012, 9:48 am

    Fun seem to me most rescue is in a Helicopter. Seems safe to me easy landing ~ Airborn

  10. Matt
    Texas
    April 12, 2012, 9:48 am

    The PAL-V definitely cared more about aesthetics, transitions, etc. But I’m more impressed by the Transition’s flying ability.

    Either way, I’m a little disappointed these don’t match the “flying car” mentality I’ve seen on so many sci-fi’s. These aren’t “flying cars” as much as they are car/plane hybrids. However, beginning steps clearly have to be taken, so I’m looking forward to if or how these change the personal automobile market.